Little Car, Big Problem?

treebeard.jpg Tree-Hugger Civilizer

Slate’s Anne Applebaum takes the opportunity presented by Indian automaker Tata’s roll-out of its cheap, micromini car, the Nano, to identify what I have long considered to be one of the most vexatious issues confronting the planet – the need to weigh the positive human effects of the rise of developing economies on their citizens against the decidedly negative effects of the consequent increase in consumption in these countries on the environment.


In her essay “The Nano Challenge,” Applebaum succinctly puts it this way: “…The Nano comes with its own moral conundrum: What happens when the laudable, currently fashionable movement to improve the environment comes directly into conflict with the equally laudable, equally fashionable movement to improve the lives of the poor?”

Indeed. The Nano will hit the Indian market costing a very affordable $2,500, making it the world’s cheapest car. It promises to greatly ease transportation challenges in the many rural parts of the country, and no doubt there will be high demand in India for a method of conveyance that gets the driver out of the rain and the wind (motorbikes are currently the subcontinent’s vehicle of choice). Thinking about how much more difficult my American life would be without a car, I can’t argue with the assertion that at least in some basic ways, the Nano is poised to elevate the quality of life for India as a whole.

It’s an obvious point to make that ascendant economies present opportunities for their participants to consume more stuff. When countries start to throw off more GDP and per capita income, their people can then afford cars, TVs, household appliances…things that suck energy, in other words. And so it is with India. Their economy is starting to hum, and now the people can drive. All 1.1 billion of them.

So this presents a problem. All those people driving cars will spew a lot of carbon emissions. The Nano may be small and promise 50 miles to the gallon, but that’s an awful lot of emissions, no matter what the fuel efficiency. And the country is only getting bigger – it’s expected to have more people than China by 2050 – and every little Indian baby born is one more tiny, adorable, carbon footprint walking the Earth.  (Speaking of China, the world’s present most populous nation is in talks to bring the Nano to its own people. Hooray.) So while it’s great that the Indian people are getting an affordable tool that improves their daily lives, they’re getting it at the cost of a tremendous amount of environmental stress on their own ecosystem and, eventually, everyone else’s.


Short of a well-designed public transportation system, which seems unlikely in virtually any large country as it requires an efficient bureaucracy and political will, this is probably something the world will be seeing a lot more of – nations coming up with ways to affordably improve their standard of living, with these ways coming at a significant environmental cost. There will, understandably, be a lot of hand-wringing among inveterate greenies like myself, but this is the very definition of an uphill battle. When a large market creates a need, and somebody meets the need cheaply, standing in the way of that demand dynamic is like trying to hold back a tsunami with a trash can lid.

Should we resignedly be satisfied with the fact that the emerging economies of the world are meeting their transportation needs from Day One with an emphasis on small, fuel-efficient cars, and look at them as a sort of laboratory producing possible solutions for our own transportation challenges? Or is there no other responsible option than to sound the alarm with the conviction that cars=sprawl=bye bye, Sunderbans?


4 Responses

  1. being that there is 65 million scooters , rickshaws and motorcycles in india most of which run poorly and are old and only hold 1 to 4 people
    75%+ of which are two cycle engines making 3 to 6 times the pollution of the Tata Nano that will hold six people
    DO the MATH … The Nano IS good for India, much safer and runs cleaner than 80% of new rickshaws and scooters being made in India . Sounds like a good thing to me

  2. I don’t know the details, however I agree with Mr. Mitchell’s point of view: two stroke engines or poorly mantained 4s are more poluent than a 0,6L 4s fresh engine. Anyway that does’nt matter, who, with a genuine sense of morals in the so called 1st. world can critisize poor people trying to live better? If he/she uses public transport or a bicicle, I can accept that; but if he/she drives a hummer/Suv or any of those “ADVANCED” fuel burners… I guess it’ll be objectable.

  3. Interesting internet site – hope to come back again…

  4. iam wondered about this site now i can know more about tata nano car thank u… hope to come again

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: